[PATCH] Minor fix of RCU documentation

[Jan Kasprzak]

	Hello, all!

the attached patch fixes an incorrect example in Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
- the "original" lock-based code should not call RCU functions, of course.

-Yenya

Signed-Off-By: Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.9/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt.orig	2004-10-18 23:53:44.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt	2004-10-30 14:49:42.706526360 +0200
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 		list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
 			if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
 				list_del(&e->list);
-				call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+				write_unlock(&auditsc_lock);
 				return 0;
 			}
 		}

-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak  <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| GPG: ID 1024/D3498839      Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/   Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ |
> Whatever the Java applications and desktop dances may lead to, Unix will <
> still be pushing the packets around for a quite a while.      --Rob Pike <
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/