Re: [PATCH 2/17] Generic backward compatibility includes for 4level

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:12:09 EST


On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't we normally add do { } while (0) after empty macros which look like
> > > a function?
> >
> > iirc Rusty tried to come up with an example some time ago where it actually
> > made a difference, but failed. But I can change it.
>
>
> if (foo)
> bar();
> else
> pml4_ERROR(x);
> something_else();

Doesn't make any difference. Try it. With a double else it may make
a difference, but that is extremly bad style imho and better resolved
with a {}. Also you'll get a clear compile error.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/