Re: [PATCH] Shift key-related error codes up and insert ECANCELED

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 10:31 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>  Take open() for
> example: it's possible that this will return ENOENT because there's no file
> there to be opened; I think it's a bad idea for it to return ENOENT when there
> is a file there, but we don't have a key, hence ENOKEY.

take open....
you don't have access to the file because you don't have a matching key
to get to it. Doesn't that kinda say EACCESS (or EPERM) would be a/the
proper return code ?
-- 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/