Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM

[Lee Revell]

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 18:59 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > - less generic variable names
> >   - s/any/rt_any/
> >   - s/gid/rt_gid/
> >   - s/mlock/rt_mlock/
> 
> Is there a compelling reason for changing all the parameter names?
> 
> I would prefer not to do that.  It is incompatible for our current
> user base, and really does not seem like an improvement.  Those names
> only appear in the context of `realtime', so the `rt_' is completely
> redundant.  For example...

I think the reason was to make the code more readable.  How about just
mapping the parameters to internal names by prepending rt_?

Lee 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/