Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8

[Ingo Molnar]

* Bill Huey <bhuey@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem
> > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry.
> 
> The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is
> irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot
> attacks against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain
> credibility with the audience that does find it useful.

oh no!

/me watches the flames fan out again as a bushfire

do you expect there to be any meaningful technical discussion resulting
out of you calling Jens' (valid) comments 'idiot attacks'? Fact is,
upstream couldnt care less about PREEMPT_REALTIME and/or the deadlock
detector at this point. Upstream _never_ cared about any not yet merged
(and in this case, completely unfinished) feature.

/me apologizes to Jens

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/