Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8

[hui]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hey, let's stop this here.
> 
> You are both (in)correct :)
> 
> 1. It makes no sense to discuss, why X has been considered correct for
> time T.
> 
> 2. Counted semaphores are a valid use and should be marked explicit as
> counted semaphores.
> 
> 3. Using mutexes and semaphores for event and completion signalling
> should be converted to the appropriate interfaces. 
> 
> A bunch of work, but not really hard.

What's the verdict ? leave the lock detector alone or change it ?

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/