Re: [PATCH] add hook to generic irq code (free_irq)

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:31:56PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> This is needed because some architectures (well, presently only UML)
> needs to be notified as things are freed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: cw@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> I can't say I'm 100% happy about this, either the name or a somewhat
> ugly hook that is called with a spinlock held but for lack of any
> better suggestions...

This looks rather bogus to me.  What prevents UML from doing it's work
at the struct hw_interrupt_type level?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/