Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_ondemand

[Con Kolivas]

Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > 3. (major) the scaling up and down of the cpufreq is now smoother.  I found 
> 	it really nasty that if it tripped < 20% idle time that the freq was 
> 	set to 100%.  This code smoothly increases the cpufreq as well as 
> 	doing a better job of decreasing it too

I'd much prefer it shot up to 100% or else every time the cpu usage went 
up there'd be an obvious lag till the machine ran at it's capable speed. 
 I very much doubt the small amount of time it spent at 100% speed with 
the default design would decrease the battery life significantly as well.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/