Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report.

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Sep 26 2004 - 17:46:21 EST


Hi!

> > > Are we still planning on having suspend2 replace swsusp eventually? It
> > > was a lot of work to switch from those high order allocations, and if we
> > > are still going to replace swsusp, perhaps it's would be a better use of
> > > your time to do other things?
> >
> > I do not know if I'm more scared of swsusp1 to kill order-8
> > allocations or if suspend2's two page sets scare me more. (Hooks
> > suspend2 needs to stop all page cache activity are scary...)
>
> Hooks to stop all page cache activity? I'm not sure what you mean.

You have system where you write image in two parts, and there are some
pretty special rules what you may not touch when writing first part,
IIRC. That is what scares me...
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/