Re: Adding .class field to struct i2c_client (was Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:22:34AM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 24.09.2004 02:02, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:41:31PM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> >
> >>Please have a look and tell me what you think. The big problem will be, 
> >>that we cannot test all configurations, so it's possible that some 
> >>devices won't be recognized anymore, because the .class entries don't 
> >>match.
> 
> >I like the patches.  If you get them in a state you like (and drop the
> >printk(), and use dev_dbg() instead), 
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >and send them 1 patch per file
> >with the Signed-off-by: line, I'll be glad to apply them.
> 
> I'll re-create them against 2.6.9-rc2-mm2.
> 
> Do you really mean one patch per file, ie. about 50 separate patches? (I 
> don't care, I simply write a script that splits them up)

Sorry, I ment one email per patch (you sent more than one patch in that
email.)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/