Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1

From: K.R. Foley
Date: Mon Sep 20 2004 - 12:17:30 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
i've released the -S1 VP patch:

http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1

NOTE: this patch is against Andrew's -mm tree and the VP patchset will
stay based on -mm until the merging process has been finished.

to get a 2.6.9-rc2-mm1-VP-S1 kernel, the patching order is:

http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.8.tar.bz2
+ http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/patch-2.6.9-rc2.bz2
+ http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.9-rc2/2.6.9-rc2-mm1/2.6.9-rc2-mm1.bz2
+ http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1

Changes relative to -S0:

- lots of merging. A good chunk of the VP patch latency breakers and
support patches are in -mm already.

- integrated my 'preemptible big kernel lock' patch into VP. This makes all BKL code preemptible while keeping correctness. A new debugging infrastructure has been added to catch code that might use the BKL
in an unsafe way. If the debugging check triggers it will print messages like:

using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code: bash/1020

please report such messages and backtraces to me. Most of the messages i've fixed so far were false positives, but one bug has been caught already via this.

Also, this BKL patch allowed the removal of two questionable latency breakers: the tty.c and the DRM BKL relaxation hack.

- fixed an SMP hardirq redirection bug - IRQ threads could be bound to multiple CPUs resulting in potentially illegal preemption of hardirq
contexts.

- temporarily dropped the ppc/ppc64 GENERIC_HARDIRQS changes, they broke
and i cannot test them.

Reports, comments welcome,

Ingo
-

Is anyone else having trouble getting this to build on x86 smp? I am getting undefined references to smp_processor_id within most, if not all, modules.

kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/