hackbench?

[Andries.Brouwer]

On http://developer.osdl.org/craiger/hackbench one finds hackbench.c
and the result that 2.6 is much better than 2.4 where scheduling is
concerned.

I was shown results that go in the other direction, so just tried
on a machine here.

50 processes
2.4.26:   24 sec
2.6.0t11: 72 sec
2.6.8.1: 120 sec

20 processes
2.4.26:    8.6 sec
2.6.0t11: 29   sec
2.6.8.1:  30   sec

This was on a 256 MB 400 MHz Pentium II.

Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/