Re: [BUG] ub.c badness in current bk

From: Pete Zaitcev
Date: Fri Sep 17 2004 - 11:17:43 EST


On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:46:34 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok, here's a modified patch that fixes the problem for me.

> + ret = sc->changed;
> + /* P3 */ printk("%s: %s changed\n", sc->name, ret ? "is": "was not");
> +
> + sc->changed = 0;
> return sc->changed;
> }

You return zero always. I don't think it's supposed to be that way.
I'm sorry, but I cannot apply it. I'll look for a better solution.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/