Re: Latest microcode data from Intel.

[Bill Davidsen]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:43:59PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
>  > The microcode driver handles the case of different types of CPUs in an SMP 
>  > system internally. Namely, it selects the appropriate microcode data 
>  > chunks for each CPU and then uploads them correctly to each one. Anyway, 
>  > it only works for Intel processors, so AMD is not in the equation anyway 
>  > (unless I discover that AMD processors support similar feature and enhance 
>  > the driver to support it).

Okay, then there was no need to patch the load program other than "it 
makes me feel better" to use the per-CPU loader if present ;-) I've 
spent more time for less benefit on other software, so I don't feel bad.
> They do support the feature, but AMD folks have stated on this list that they
> don't intend to release any updates other than through their
> conventional means (Ie, BIOS updates).

That's fine as long as you run some approved BIOS, your vendor provides 
timely updates, etc. Having been on the wrong end of a few cases where a 
BIOS "upgrade" broke something, I confess to liking the separation of 
functionality.
> There was a post just 2-3 weeks ago where someone patched microcode.c to
> work on AMD64s.

--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/