Re: kernbench on 512p

From: Greg Edwards
Date: Tue Sep 14 2004 - 13:57:19 EST


On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
| Greg Edwards wrote:
|
| >Manfred,
| >
| >Lockstat output attached from 2.6.9-rc2 at 512p and 2.6.9-rc2 + your two
| >remaining RCU patches at 512p. kernbench was run without any arguments.
| >
| >The difference for RCU looks great.
| >
| >
| >
| Which value did you use for RCU_GROUP_SIZE? I'm not sure what's the
| optimal value for 512p - probably 32 or so.

I used what was defined in the patch

+#define RCU_GROUP_SIZE 2

I can try running with a couple different values and see how it looks.

Greg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/