Re: fake_ino fixes

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:52:19AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> This improves /proc inode numbering a bit.
> If ino_t is 32-bit: just fix task 0 handling
> If ino_t is 64-bit: fix large fd numbers too
> Handling PID 0xffff on 32-bit was dropped in
> favor of handling PID 0 correctly, since PID 0
> can be seen with the default pid_max value.

Sounds like a good stopgap measure unless someone's already got a more
comprehensive sweep that enables larger pid spaces on 32-bit.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/