Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM

[James Morris]

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Lee Revell wrote:

> +config SECURITY_REALTIME
> +	tristate "Realtime Capabilities"
> +	depends on SECURITY && SECURITY_CAPABILITIES!=y
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Answer M to build realtime support as a Linux Security
> +	  Module.  Answering Y to build realtime capabilities into the
> +	  kernel makes no sense.

Why not just make it a bool then?

I wonder if it might be better to specify configuration via 
/proc/<pid>/attr rather than module parameters.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/