Re: [patch] to add device+inode check to ipt_owner.c - HACKED UP

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 08:49:28AM +0100, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 11:39 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > ... did i sent a patch?
> > 
> > did i send a patch??  i don't _think_ so *lol* :)
> 
> heh :)
> 
> IMO the number of constraints involed here make using this patch fairly
> involved (for something security related at least) in that, as you said,
> you have to:
> 
>  - be careful to use ACCEPT rules only
>  - be careful that you do:
>     1. remove fw rules
>     2. upgrade software
>     3. replace rules
 
 i've since replaced the code with use of d_path() which stephen
 smalley kindly pointed out, negating the need for doing a
 commit-replace-thing.

> plus the fastpath code looks very hairy with at least 3 locks taken and
> O(num_tasks * max_fds) unpreemptable in softirq...

 *shrug*.  that's the way ipt_owner works...

> There has to be a simpler approach, perhaps passing in a path, looking
> up the dentry in current namespace and setting an unused flag in
> d_vfs_flags? That way you could just match on skb->sk->sk_socket->file-
> >f_dentry.
 
  ooo...

> I don't know enough about VFS to know if that's really possible. I mean
> would you need vfsmnt too to make it accurate across namespaces? 


 well you need vfsmnt in order to trackdown the full path name.

 l.

-- 
--
Truth, honesty and respect are rare commodities that all spring from
the same well: Love.  If you love yourself and everyone and everything
around you, funnily and coincidentally enough, life gets a lot better.
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net";>      lkcl.net      </a> <br />
<a href="mailto:lkcl@xxxxxxxx";> lkcl@xxxxxxxx </a> <br />

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/