Re: [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 17:02:21 EST


William Lee Irwin III writes:

> Checking in_lock_functions() (not sure what the name in Zwane's code
> was) for non-leaf functions in get_wchan() in addition to
> in_sched_functions() should do. e.g.

Well, no, not if we are two levels deep at this point (i.e. something
calls _spin_lock which calls __preempt_spin_lock). I really don't
want to have to start doing a stack trace in profile_pc().

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/