Re: [PATCH] missing pci_disable_device()

[Kenji Kaneshige]

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2004-09-08 at 04:14, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> > Think about unloading frame buffers or PCI devices with multiple
>> > functions and multiple drivers. I agree the drivers definitely want
>> > fixing where appropriate. I'm not sure your approach is safe (although a
>> 
>> I don't understand what you are worried about. Could you tell me
>> what would be a problem with frame buffers or PCI devices with
>> multiple functions?
> 
> If I have a framebuffer driver loaded for my video card in bitmap mode
> all is well. If I unload it you then disable the video hardware even
> though it would still be otherwise usable in text mode.
> 
> The same occurs when one PCI device has multiple functions (not PCI
> functions but linux drivers using it). There are some examples of this
> such as the CS5520 where one BAR is the IDE controller.
> 

Thank you for answering.

I understand that there are some devices that need to be enabled
even after their drivers are unloaded, and my approach might not
be safe in this case. I think the best way to solve the problem
(missing pci_disable_device) is to fix broken drivers one by one.
I think debug printk will helpful to fix those drivers, but I
don't know what kind of message is appropriate...

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/