Re: swapping and the value of /proc/sys/vm/swappiness

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> Oh, I see what you mean. I think we're much better off sticking the
> mechanism for autotuning stuff in the kernel -

Agreed.  Autotuning like this appears to work best by having
a self adjusting algorithm, often negative feedback loops so
things get balanced out automagically.

Works way better than anything looking at indirect data and
then tweaking some magic knobs...

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/