Re: [patch] preempt-smp.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> at a quick glance your patch doesnt seem to cover the following locking
> primitives: read_lock_irqsave(), read_lock_irq(), write_lock_irqsave,
> write_lock_irq(). Also, i think your 2.6.6 patch doesnt apply anymore
> because it clashes with your very nice out-of-line spinlocks patch that
> went into -BK recently ;)

Yes i intentionally avoided rwlocks, in that case i think write_lock_* 
would be the one to work on, but this is all covered by CONFIG_PREEMPT and 
your patch now.

Thanks,
	Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/