Re: [Patch 2/6]: ext3 reservations: Renumber the ext3 reservationsioctls

From: Stephen C. Tweedie
Date: Wed Sep 08 2004 - 04:45:28 EST


Hi,

On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 23:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Maybe you could reuse the XFS reservation ioctls instead of adding
> another set? Having incompatible APIs for the same thing on different
> filesystems sounds like the wrong way to go.

I don't mind either way. But I just looked, and I think they are doing
different things. If I'm reading the XFS bits right, the XFS ioctls
actively reserve/free disk space; but the ext3 ones do nothing except
set/query the size of the per-inode sliding reservation window.

So sounds like they are best kept separate for now.

Cheers,
Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/