Re: [discuss] f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel

[Herbert Poetzl]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:29:46PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:25:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > It may help your module, but won't solve the general problem shorter
> > > term.
> > But longer term it will be better, so why not go there?
> > Once the infrastructure is there, drivers will be able to be
> > migrated as required.
> 
> I have no problems with that. You would need two new entry points:
> one 64bit one without BKL and a 32bit one also without BKL. 
> 
> I think there were some objections to this scheme in the past,
> but I cannot think of a good alternative. 

uhm, apologies for dropping in, for what exactly
are two (new) separate entry points needed?

somehow lost context here ...

TIA,
Herbert

> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/