Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Andrew Morton]

Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've noticed another thing. There is a default bust_spinlocks() in 
>  lib/bust_spinlocks.c. 4 architectures including x86 have their own 
>  copies of it, which are exactly the same as the default one.
> 
>  So do we really need lib/bust_spinlocks.c or we can move a signle copy 
>  of this function to kernel/printk.c?

I'd leave it as is - nobody's complaining.

In the more modern scheme of things we'd move that file to kernel/ and
require that per-arch Kconfigs define CONFIG_NEED_GENERIC_BUST_SPINLOCKS,
then use that in kernel/Makefile.  But doing that now would be gratuitous
noise, IMO.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/