Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] teach kswapd about watermarks

[Nick Piggin]

David S. Miller wrote:
> If you're only doing atomic_set() and atomic_read() on kswapd_max_order,
> you're not doing anything atomic on the datum so no need to make it
> an atomic_t.

OK, sure. And yes, anything other than loads and stores on that
value would never be correct.

There is still the small race of two threads updating the value,
but that doesn't matter (and the atomics don't help there anyway
of course).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/