Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives

[Spam]

>>>>>> "David" == David Masover <ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

David>> File-as-a-dir has numerous advantages, but enough have been
David>> discussed.  Short list is image mounts, tarballs, streams,
David>> metas, and namespace unification.  Longer list and explanations
David>> can be found if you RTFA.

> And it has numerous dis-advantages as well, since it doesn't have a
> good set of semantics and syntax defined yet, nor does it explain
> except by vigorous handwaving the performance and security impacts it
> can have.

> My personal feeling is that the mount(8) command should be the tool
> used to extract and expose the internal namespace of files like this
> and to then graft it onto the standard Unix namespace with gross Unix
> semantics, but it's own wacky internal semantics.  This way, standard
> tools don't care, but special tools which know how to handle it can do
> what they want.


>> mount -t tarfs /some/place/on/disk/foo.tar.gz /mnt/tar
>> cp /var/tmp/img.gif .
>> umount /mnt/tar

> Oops!  Someone did a rm /some/place/on/disk/foo.tar.gz between steps
> one and two.  Now what happens?  Please define those semantics...

  Uhm, can you delete a file (loop) that is mounted?

> John




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/