Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7

[Mark_H_Johnson]

>> I also looked briefly at find_first_bit since it appears in a number
>> of traces. Just curious, but the coding for the i386 version is MUCH
>> different in style than several other architectures (e.g, PPC64,
>> SPARC). Is there some reason why it is recursive on the x86 and a loop
>> in the others?
>
>what do you mean by recursive? It uses the SCAS (scan string) x86
>instruction.

Never mind. In bitops.c I misread "find_first_bit" (the call near the end)
as "find_next_bit" and thought there was recursion here.

--Mark H Johnson
  <mailto:Mark_H_Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/