Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:31:01 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christer Weinigel <christer@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Spam <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>,
wichert@xxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx,
hch@xxxxxx, Linux Filesystem Development <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, flx@xxxxxxxxxxx,
reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
Jeremy Allison wrote:Streams in a Word file?
Yep.
Are you saying that when I copy a .doc file onto my Linux box and off,
I lose part of a Word document?
Right now no, because when Samba refuses the stream open, Word falls
back into a "tar"-like mode where it linearises the streams into the
data (it's a legacy mode for storing data on a FAT drive, not an NTFS
drive). However, the problem is that no currently supported Microsoft
OS doesn't have streams-capable NTFS support.
I meant when I copy not using Samba. For example, I copy the .doc
file in Windows NT to an FTP server.
Does the FTP operation magically linearise the .doc streams on demand?
Or does FTP lose part of the Word document?
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/