Re: [PATCH] Re: boot time, process start time, and NOW time

From: George Anzinger
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 19:59:55 EST


Tim Schmielau wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, john stultz wrote:


On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 16:00, Tim Schmielau wrote:

George, please excuse my lack of understanding. What again where the
precise reasons to have an ntp-corrected uptime?

Ah, here's the thread with the first mention of it that I could find.

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0306.1/1471.html

As I recall the problem was that jiffies since boot was being converted to get uptime base on 1/HZ = 1 jiffie. Since it is really not quite that, there was an error. Using clock_monotonic seemed like the right answer as it eliminated the error AND made the result consistant with get_clock(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,..).

The alternate answer is, of course, to directly convert the elapsed jiffies. The main problem with this is that this can be a BIG number and, therefor, the math needs to be carefully. And, of course, it is inconsistant with get_clock(), but that is a new interface...

George


Ah, it seems George indeed did the patch because of these problems:

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0306.1/1641.html

However, the actual reason were just missing wall_to_monotonic initializations:

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0306.2/1330.html

This was fixed in mainline:

http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset%403f0e60dcpIosK3b5_uJ-aD9Mare17w

Tim


--
George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/