Re: [2.6 patch] kill __always_inline

[Andrew Morton]

Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> An issue that we already discussed at 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 times:
> 
> 2.6.9-rc1 includes __always_inline which was formerly in  -mm.
> __always_inline doesn't make any sense:
> 
> __always_inline is _exactly_ the same as __inline__, __inline and inline .
> 
> 
> The patch below removes __always_inline again:

But what happens if we later change `inline' so that it doesn't do
the `always inline' thing?

An explicit usage of __always_inline is semantically different than
boring old `inline'.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/