Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format

[Neil Horman]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I tried to keep it as short as possible:  here is a page describing the 
> most optimal format for sending patches to Linux kernel developers.
>
>     http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
>
> This URL should be permanent, feel free to bookmark it.
> Comments welcome.
>
>     Jeff
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

So, this may already be asked and answered (apologies if it has), but is 
it worth gpg-signing submissions so that authenticity can be verified to 
some degree when a patch is posted (and for archival purposes)? I ask 
because this is whats done on the fedora extras channel when updates get 
pushed, and it seems like a reasonable addition to the process.
Neil

--
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *Software Engineer
 *Red Hat, Inc.
 *nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
 *http://pgp.mit.edu
 ***************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/