[PATCH] make single-step into signal delivery stop in handler

From: Roland McGrath
Date: Mon Aug 30 2004 - 23:46:16 EST


On x86 and x86-64, setting up to run a signal handler clears the
single-step bit (TF) in the processor flags before starting the handler.
This makes sense when a process is handling its own SIGTRAPs.

But when TF is set because PTRACE_SINGLESTEP was used, and that call
specified a handled signal so the handler setup is happening, it doesn't
make so much sense. When the debugger stops to show you a signal about to
be delivered, and that signal should be handled, and then you do step or
stepi, you expect to see the signal handler code. In fact, the signal
handler runs to completion and then you see the single-step trap at the
resumed code instead of seeing the handler.

This patch changes signal handler setup so that when TF is set and the
thread is under ptrace control, it synthesizes a single-step trap after
setting up the PC and registers to start the handler. This makes that
PTRACE_SINGLESTEP not strictly a "step", since it actually runs no user
instructions at all. But it is definitely what a debugger user wants, so
that single-stepping always stops and shows each and every instruction
before it gets executed.



Thanks,
Roland

Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- vanilla-linux-2.6/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c 2004-08-30 20:48:24.132472094 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-ptracefix/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c 2004-08-30 20:47:30.000000000 -0700
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/elf.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/ucontext.h>
@@ -401,7 +402,13 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct
regs->xes = __USER_DS;
regs->xss = __USER_DS;
regs->xcs = __USER_CS;
- regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
+ if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+ } else {
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ }
+ }

#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%p ra=%p\n",
@@ -480,7 +487,13 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, stru
regs->xes = __USER_DS;
regs->xss = __USER_DS;
regs->xcs = __USER_CS;
- regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
+ if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+ } else {
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ }
+ }

#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%p ra=%p\n",
--- vanilla-linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32_signal.c 2004-08-30 20:48:24.160468505 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-ptracefix/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32_signal.c 2004-08-30 20:47:46.000000000 -0700
@@ -489,7 +491,13 @@ void ia32_setup_frame(int sig, struct k_
regs->ss = __USER32_DS;

set_fs(USER_DS);
- regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
+ if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+ } else {
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ }
+ }

#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%p ra=%p\n",
@@ -583,7 +591,13 @@ void ia32_setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct
regs->ss = __USER32_DS;

set_fs(USER_DS);
- regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
+ if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+ } else {
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ }
+ }

#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%p ra=%p\n",
--- vanilla-linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c 2004-08-30 20:48:24.186465171 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-ptracefix/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c 2004-08-30 20:47:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -319,7 +319,13 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, stru
regs->rsp = (unsigned long)frame;

set_fs(USER_DS);
- regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
+ if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+ } else {
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ }
+ }

#ifdef DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%p ra=%p\n",
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/