Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 09:17:24 EST


On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Hans Reiser wrote:

> Why are you guys even considering going to any pain at all to distort
> semantics for the sake of backup? tar is easy, we'll fix it and send in
> a patch.

Because not everybody uses tar. Quite a few people use a
network backup system, while others use duplicity, RPM uses
cpio internally and big companies tend to use proprietary
network backup suites.

Breaking people's setup is something to worry about.

--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/