Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0

[Lee Revell]

On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 23:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > i've attached mlock-test2.cc that should test this theory. The code
> > > breaks up the mlock-ed region into 8 equal pieces and does mlock() on
> > > them separately. It's basically a lock-break done in user-space. Does
> > > this change the nature of xruns?
> > 
> > This does change the xruns.  I have to `mlock-test2 8000' to produce
> > any xrun at all, and that only produces a 2-300 usec xrun.  With
> > mlockall-test the threshold to produce an xrun was ~1500.
> 
> did you try mlock-test.cc too? Just to make sure that mlock-test.cc is
> equivalent to mlockall-test.cc.
> 

That attachment was also missing.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/