Re: PATCH [2/7] Fix posix locking code

[Trond Myklebust]

På lau , 14/08/2004 klokka 16:00, skreiv Matthew Wilcox:

> I know I said I thought file_lock_operations was the right thing to
> do ...  but now I think that this isn't a property of the file_lock so
> much as it is a property of the underlying filesystem.  I think putting a
> lock_operations into struct file is maybe a bit much.  How about adding
> a lock_operations pointer to file_operations?

Lock operations are as much a property of the lock *type*. A BSD lock
may/will have an entirely different set of callbacks.

Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/