Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion]Clustersummit materials

From: Steven Dake
Date: Thu Aug 12 2004 - 18:09:11 EST


On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 13:37, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-08-12T10:42:16,
> Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> > agreed... Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi
> > in kernel.
> >
> > Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere? I'd like to have a
> > look.
>
> It's not yet at the final location, but we put up what we got at
> http://wiki.trick.ca/linux-ha/Transis .
>
>
Lars

Thanks for posting transis. I had a look at the examples and API. The
API is of course different then openais and focused on client/server
architecture.

I tried a performance test by sending a 64k message, and then receiving
it 10 times with two nodes. This operation takes about 5 seconds on my
hardware which is 128k/sec. I was expecting more like 8-10MB/sec. Is
there anything that can be done to improve the performance?

Thanks
-steve

Certainly a different sort of API then openais...

> Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-BrÃe <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/