Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks

[Kurt Garloff]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:12:17PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Is this new (i.e. you just did this)?  It's basically the same result we
> > > had from a few years ago.
> > 
> > Yes, did it today.
> 
> Thanks, James.  Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are
> in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely().

Well, you may want to drop the unlikely if you dislike it.
The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO.

Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet.

Reards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff                   <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>             [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Head)        <garloff@xxxxxxx>    [SUSE Nuernberg, DE]

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature