Re: Solving suspend-level confusion

[David Brownell]

On Friday 06 August 2004 13:04, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > These look to me like "wrong device-level suspend state" cases.
> 
> Actually, suspend-to-disk has to suspend all devices *twices*. Once it
> wants them in "D0 but DMA/interrupts stopped", and once in "D3cold but
> I do not really care power is going to be cut anyway". I do not think
> this can be expressed with PCI states.

How are those different from "PCI_D1" then later "PCI_D3hot"?
I'd understood that loss of VAUX was always possible, so robust
drivers always had to handle resume  from PCI_D3cold.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/