Re: Solving suspend-level confusion

[David Brownell]

On Thursday 05 August 2004 03:19, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> That's what my patch does. I kept the existing api untouched so that:
> 
> device_resume();
> 
> is actually a wrapper for
> 
> device_resume_tree(&default_device_tree);
> 
> Proof of the pudding coming :>

Sounds good.  Will it be possible to remove devices during
these tree operations?  Probably never the current one.

And (evil chuckle) how will it behave if two tasks are doing
that concurrently?  The no-overlap case would be fully
parallel, I'd hope!

- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/