Re: [PATCH] increase mlock limit to 32k

[Rik van Riel]

On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Well please note that the initial patch got 100% rejects because it was
> against a kernel which was already using limits of PAGE_SIZE rather than
> zero.  An incremental patch might be saner..

Oh duh, Chris Wright's patch decreased the limits from PAGE_SIZE
to 0 ;(   Sorry about the rejects...

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/