Re: block layer sg, bsg

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <20040804232116.GA30152@xxxxxx> (at 5 Aug 2004 01:21:16 +0200,Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:21:16 +0200), Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> says:

> On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:22:54PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:18:50 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 07:28:04PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > So please never pass any structures with read/write/netlink.
> > > 
> > > Sorry...  This is pretty much a given IMO.
> > 
> > Yes, netlink would be a nop if we gave in to Andi's reccomendation
> > :-)
> 
> Well, 32bit ipsec on x86-64/ia64 is a NOP because of that.

Hmm, I don't get the point.
What part (or which structore) is broken?

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/