Re: DRM code reorganization

[Keith Whitwell]

Ian Romanick wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > We've actually managed to do a fair bit of cleanup already - if you 
> > look at the gamma driver, there's a lot of stuff in there which used 
> > to be shared but ifdef'ed out between all the drivers.  The 
> > __HAVE_MULTIPLE_DMA_QUEUES macro is a remnant of this, but I think 
> > you'll break gamma when you try & remove it.
>
>
> It looks like __HAVE_MULTIPLE_DMA_QUEUES is a superset of 
> __HAVE_DMA_QUEUE.  My thinking was that the code for those two options 
> could be merged.  Does that seem reasonable?

If it looks reasonable in the codebase, I don't know any reason not to.

Keith

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/