Re: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU SchedulerEvaluation

[Andrew Morton]

Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Have you considered submitting one to -mm* for wider testing?
> 
>  I've made patches available for 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 and I'll provide them for 
>  mm2 as soon as possible.  Is there something else I should be doing?

I'll probably drop staircase soon, give nicksched a whizz for a couple of
cycles.  You're welcome to join the queue ;)

But let me re-repeat again that CPU scheduler problems tend to take a
_long_ time to turn up - you make some change and two months later some
person with a weird workload on expensive hardware hits a nasty corner
case.  So I do think that we'd have to hit a nasty problem with the current
scheduler to go making deep changes.

Although most of the fragility has been in CPU/node/HT balancing rather
than in the timeslice allocation area.  I assume you're not touching the
former.  It's the desktop users who seem to be more affected by the
timeslice allocation algorithms, and the testing turnaround is much faster
there.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/