Re: [PATCH][2.6] first/next_cpu returns values > NR_CPUS

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 04:52:18PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > The following caused some fireworks whilst merging i386 cpu hotplug.
> > any_online_cpu(0x2) returns 32 on i386 if we're forced to continue past
> > the only set bit due to the additional find_first_bit in the
> > find_next_bit i386 implementation. Not wanting to change current
> > behaviour in the bitops primitives and since the NR_CPUS thing is a
> > cpumask issue, i've opted to fix next_cpu() and first_cpu() instead.
> > Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This might save a couple of lines of code.

Nice, i'd prefer that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/