Re: net_device->irq vs pci_dev->irq

[Jeff Garzik]

Frank Cusack wrote:
> Sent this to linux-net@ with no response today, anyone care to comment?

netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx is the best place for network stack/driver development.


> In the e1000-5.2.30.1 driver, "they" no longer propagate pdev->irq into
> netdev->irq.  This looks safe to add back in, am I mistaken?  I want
> ifconfig to report the irq, which it no longer does without netdev->irq.

netdev->irq is purely informational.  Setting, or not, is largely 
irrelevant these days.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/