Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jul  7, 2004, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:55:01AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jul  6, 2004, Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > Which means 0xdeadbeef is a perfectly valid literal for an unsigned int.
>> 
>> Assuming ints are 32-bits wide.

> ITYM "at least 32-bits wide".

No, exactly 32-bits wide.  If they're wider, it's going to be signed
int.  If they're narrower, it's going to be long or unsigned long,
depending on how wide long is.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/