Re: PPC64: vio_find_node removal?

[Hollis Blanchard]

On Jul 1, 2004, at 5:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Ok, so if we add call to kobject_get in kset_find_obj we can just add
> kobject_put right in vio_find_name because there can be only one-to-one
> match between a slot and a vio device and we don't need refcounting 
> there,
> right?

Hmm. Yes, I agree that we need kobject_get and _put between 
kset_find_obj() and vio_find_name().

As for the lack of vio_dev refcounting... I think we can get away with 
it because rpaphp_vio.c is the only user who might unregister a 
vio_dev.

--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/