Re: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4

From: Con Kolivas
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:17:02 EST


On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 21:28 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Quoting Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:29 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now another "problem":
> > > > Maybe it's because I'm tired, but it seems like
> > > > your fix-patch made moving windows in X11 is less smooth.
> > > > I wanted to mention it, just in case there's some other
> > > > person, who sees this behaviour, too. In case I'm the
> > > > only one seeing it, you may forget it. ;)
> > >
> > > I can see the same with 7.4-1 (that's 2.6.7-ck2 plus the fix-patch): X11
> > > feels sluggish while moving windows around. Simply by loading a Web page
> > > into Konqueror and dragging Evolution over it, makes me able to
> > > reproduce this problem.
> > >
> > > Doing the same on 2.6.7-mm3 is totally smooth, however.
> >
> > I think staircase-7.7 fixed this, too. (for me).
> > Have a try.
>
> Staircase 7.7 over 2.6.7-ck2 still feels somewhat sluggish... Renicing X
> to -5 seems to improve a bit, but -mm3 is smoother and does not require
> renicing the X server.

Hi

I seem to have an oversight with ck in the batch implementation that may
be causing problems that wouldn't happen if you used the standalone
staircase patch. Can you try the standalone s7.7 patch (not from the split
out patches in the ck directory) that is in my patches/2.6/2.6.7
directory?

Thanks
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/