Re: [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite

From: Vojtech Pavlik
Date: Sat Jun 26 2004 - 13:30:42 EST


On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Final note: I might be willing to just change the rules, if people can
> show that no paths that might need the volatile behaviour exist any more.
> They definitely used to exist, though, and that's a BIG decision to make.

At least input pretty much relies on the fact that bitops don't need
locking and act as memory barriers.

--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/